Legal Opinion

M&T Bank Corp. v. Gemstone CDO VII, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 2009PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1748Memorandum: Defendant Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. (DBSI) contends on appeal that Supreme Court erred in denying that part of the motion of DBSI and Deutsche Bank AG (DBAG) seeking dismissal of the complaint against DBSI, and defendants HBK Investments LB HBK Partners II LB and HBK Management LLC (collectively, HBK defendants) contend on appeal that the court erred in denying their motion seeking dismissal of the complaint against them. We conclude that the court should have granted those parts of the motion of DBSI and DBAG with respect to the third, fifth and sixth causes of action…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Eurycleia Partners, LP v. Seward & Kissel, LLPNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Kimmell v. SchaeferNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. CPC International Inc. v. McKessonNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Pludeman v. NORTHERN LEASINGNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Wright v. SelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. AMUSEMENT INDUSTRY, INC. v. SternDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  2. Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank v. Morgan Stanley & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  3. M & T Bank Corp. v. LaSalle Bank National Ass'nDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2012
  4. M&T BANK CORPORATION v. MCGRAW-HILL COMPANIES, INC.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. Barrett v. GrendaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API