Legal Opinion

Pixley v. Catey

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 1936No. 15,214PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wiecking, J. —

This was an action in damages by appellee for personal injuries alleged to have been received as the consequence of an assault and battery by appellant. The complaint was in two paragraphs. To this the appellant filed an answer in two paragraphs; the first in general denial and the second paragraph a plea of self defense. To the second paragraph of answer the appellee filed a reply in general denial, closing the issues. The cause was submitted to a jury for trial, resulting in a verdict for the appellee in the sum of $1,500.00. The appellant seasonably filed his motion for new…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Indianapolis Bleaching Co. v. McMillanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Timmons v. KenrickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Borkenstein v. SchrackIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. Dayton & Western Traction Co. v. MarshallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. ApplegateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thrasher v. VAN BUREN TP. OF MONROE CTY.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Decatur County AG-Services, Inc. v. YoungIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance v. Mid-Century InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Decatur County AG-Services, Inc. v. YoungIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Klam v. KoppelIdaho Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API