State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance v. Mid-Century Insurance
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLowdermilk, C. J.
Appellant, plaintiff below, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, filed its amended complaint for damages against Mid-Century Insurance Company and Willard Gross, appellees, defendants below, for medical payments paid to appellant’s insured. Appellant based its right of recovery on the theory of subrogation of its medical coverage endorsement under an automobile policy.
The issues were finally closed hy the appellee filing an answer under Supreme Court Rule 1-3 to appellant’s amended complaint.
The case was tried to the court without a jury and the parties stipulated the facts which…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pokraka v. Lummus Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1952
- State ex rel. Mason v. JacobsIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
- Pixley v. CateyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1936
3Cited by6 opinions
- Melick v. StanleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Baxter v. I.S.T.A. Insurance TrustIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Mutual Hospital Ins., Inc. v. MacGregorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF ALA. v. BoldingCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Emmco Insurance Co. v. Indiana Farmers Mut. Ins. Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.