Legal Opinion

Magnolia Pipe Line Company v. Cowen

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 8, 1970No. 42632PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McINERNEY, Justice:

The Defendant contractors-subcontractors damaged Plaintiff’s underground pipeline while they were engaged in construction work at Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma. The actual damage occurred when one of their digging or bulldozing machines, called a “ripper,” struck the pipeline and caused a dent or stricture therein. Plaintiff did not discover the damage until some months later, when a “scraper” or internal cleaning device, which had been inserted into the pipeline at Ft. Worth, Texas, failed to appear on schedule at the pipeline’s Oklahoma City terminus. Upon search and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Phelps v. Woodward Con. Co., N. Util.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Richey & Gilbert Co. v. Northwestern Natural Gas Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Transport Indemnity Company v. PageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  4. Tulsa Auto Dealers Auction v. North Side State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  5. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. HenningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Franco-American Charolaise, Ltd. v. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  2. Hawzipta v. Independent School District No. 1-004 of Noble CountyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
  3. Anderson v. Vian Cemetery Ass'nCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
  4. Hinds v. JohnstonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2009
  5. American Southwest Properties, Inc. v. Tulsa County Board of EqualizationCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API