Legal Opinion

Griswold v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 6, 1986No. CR 86-88PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.

In this appeal appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence of forcible compulsion as an element of rape. We find the evidence sufficient and affirm.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of three counts of rape involving three female children, ages thirteen, ten, and five, and sentenced to twenty years on each count, with the sentences to be served consecutively. His arguments on appeal are directed at two of the convictions. He does not challenge his conviction for raping the five-year-old. Our jurisdiction is pursuant to Sup. Ct. R. 29(l)(b).

Appellant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hammond v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Tryon v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State of Oregon v. RisenOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Spencer v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  5. Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. PalmerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  2. Dumond v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Caldwell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Sublett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Mann v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API