Legal Opinion
Henderson 66 Sales, Inc. v. Harvison
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided February 7, 1973No. Civ. A. No. CA 3-5730-EPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MAHON, District Judge.
On April 4, 1972, the plaintiffs in this cause of action filed a suit for injunctive relief and damages for defendants’ alleged violations of the Sherman, Clayton and Robinson-Patman Antitrust Acts. With the exception of Albert B. Alkek, service of process was effected on all parties. On July 10, 1972, plaintiffs, pursuant to Rule 4(d)(7), Fed.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C. (1970), filed the first of two motions for substitute service on Alkek. Reciting that officers had been unsuccessful “on numerous occasions” in attempting to serve process upon the defendant at…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. PollinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Roy Ferrell v. Trailmobile, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- General Telephone Corporation v. General Telephone Answering ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Spencer v. Texas Factors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Franks v. MontandonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sagers v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1975
- Whitman v. United States Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1980