Legal Opinion

Dees v. Hallum

District Court, N.D. Mississippi

Decided August 15, 1989No. Civ. A. DC 88-43-D-OPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DAVIDSON, District Judge.

Introduction

The motion of Grand Rent a Car, Inc. (Grand) for partial summary judgment on its counter and cross-claims for declaratory judgment brings this matter to the court’s attention. Grand seeks a declaration that it owes no insurance coverage to its co-defendants, Robert Shawn Hallum and Diane C. Hallum, for any liability to the plaintiffs herein arising out of the automobile accident which gives rise to the instant action. Plaintiffs, in response, raise the applicability of California law to the construction of the rental contract entered into…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Clay v. Sun Ins. Office Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Wildman v. Government Employees Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Mitchell v. CraftMississippi Supreme Court · 1968

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Zurich American Ins. Co. v. GoodwinMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  2. O'ROURKE v. Colonial Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Portsmouth Redevelopment & Housing Authority v. BMI Apartments AssociatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994
  4. In Re Catfish Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1995
  5. Rieger v. Group Health Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API