Legal Opinion

O'ROURKE v. Colonial Ins. Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1993No. 91-CA-169PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

624 So.2d 84 (1993)

Betty L. O'ROURKE and Daniel O'Rourke

v.

COLONIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA.

No. 91-CA-169.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

September 2, 1993.

Dana J. Swan, Chapman Lewis & Swan, Clarksdale, for appellant.

Marc A. Biggers, Upshaw Williams Biggers Page & Kruger, Lonnie D. Bailey, Upshaw William Firm, Greenwood, for appellees.

Before DAN M. LEE, P.J., PITTMAN and JAMES L. ROBERTS, Jr., JJ.

JAMES L. ROBERTS, Jr., Justice, for the Court:

The O'Rourkes, residents of Tennessee, were involved in an accident with an uninsured motorist ("UM") on April 29, 1988 in DeSoto County. The 1988…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. CraftMississippi Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Boardman v. United Services Auto. Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  3. McDaniel v. RitterMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Crowe v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Wickline v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sentinel Industrial Contracting Corp. v. Kimmins Industrial Service Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Zurich American Ins. Co. v. GoodwinMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Owens v. Mississippi Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Beckler v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  5. Powe v. Roy Anderson Const. Co.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API