Legal Opinion
Blake v. Metz
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 23, 1929No. 19016PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIFFENDAFFER, C.
This is an action originally brought by defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as. plaintiff, against Ralph A. Blake, county treasurer of Creek county, to enjoin the sale of certain' property for taxes. The petition is short and is as follows:
“The plaintiff alleges that he is now, and was at all the times hereinafter set forth the owner in fee simple of the following described real estate, situate in Creek county, Okla., to wit: The northeast quarter of S. E. Yi of section 36-17-7-E, Creek county, Okla., and that all of said lots in said block as above described are…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Roth v. Union Nat. Bank of BartlesvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Farmers' & Merchants' Bank of Phœnix v. Arizona Mut. Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
- Twine v. CareySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894
- Myers v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Blake v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hamilton v. BrowderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Midwest Refining Co. v. GeorgeWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
- Settle v. FrakesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Blake v. MetzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Flower Hospital, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942