Legal Opinion

Blake v. Metz

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 23, 1929No. 19017PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DIFFENDAFFER, C.

The identical questions involved in Blake, .County Treasurer, and Fred L. Patrick, County Assessor, v. W. H. Metz, 136 Okla. 146, 276 Pac. 762, are involved in this appeal. The pleadings are almost alike, the only difference being that a different tract of land is here involved, and in the petition and amended petition herein, the discrepancy in the description of the land does not appear. The record is in other respects identical, except that in this case it does not appear that the assistant county attorney approved the journal entry of the judgment.

From what is held in that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Blake v. MetzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Settle v. FrakesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API