Legal Opinion

Villines v. North Arkansas Regional Medical Center

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided September 7, 2011No. CA 10-1196PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN B. ROBBINS, Judge.

11 This appeal arises from a grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee, North Arkansas Regional Medical Center (NARMC). The circuit court ruled that, as a matter of law, NARMC did not act negligently with regard to its informed-consent policy and did not proximately cause damages to appellants Kelsey and Marlene Villines. Because questions of material fact remain, we reverse and remand.

Mr. Villines presented at NARMC with kidney stones in November 2003. When the stones did not pass overnight, Dr. Scott Ferguson obtained Mr. Villines’s consent for surgery. NARMC…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. GillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Giem v. Williams, AdministratrixSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. KilgoreCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  4. Williamson v. ElrodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Aronson v. HarrimanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Phillippy v. ANB Financial Services, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  2. Gartman v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
  3. Morris v. Daimler Trucks North America, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API