Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Harrington v. Wands

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1871PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Application for mandamus. The relator was prosecuting attorney, and the respondent the county clerk of St. Clair county. The facts are sufficiently set forth in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chief Justice:

— These cases have sometimes been heard upon the facts stated in the papers, as upon a hearing in chancery upon bill and answer. But we suppose that when a demurrer is formally made, the party demurring has the affirmative.

Graves, J.

This is a petition for a mandamus, but the final purpose of the application is to settle an unhappy controversy which has grown out of movements to change and re-locate the county seat of St. Clair county. It appears that for about fifty years the seat had continued at St. Clair, when, and in October, 1869, the board of supervisors submitted to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Underwood v. McDuffeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Swartwout v. Michigan Air Line RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Warren v. CrosbyOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  3. In re Fourth Judicial DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Burrows v. Delta Transportation Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Henderson v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1908

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API