Legal Opinion

Universal Card Services Corp. v. Akins (In Re Akins)

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas

Decided May 17, 1999No. 19-50433PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUPPLEMENTAL AND AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

FRANK R. MONROE, Bankruptcy Judge.

The Court held a trial of this proceeding on April 22, 1999 at 9:30 a.m. At the conclusion of the trial, the Court ruled for the Defendant. A hearing was set on the Defendant’s Request for Attorneys Fees under 11 U.S.C. § 523(d). That matter was taken under advisement. In order that the trial on the merits and the request for attorneys fees by Defendant be fully addressed in writing, these Supplemental and Amended Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are being issued under B.R. 7052 to amend…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Davison-Paxon Co. v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
  3. Boydston v. BoydstonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  4. Ranier Bank v. Poteet (In Re Poteet)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
  5. Mercantile Bank of Illinois v. Williamson (In Re Williamson)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mattly v. Spiegel, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  2. At&T Universal Card Services v. MercerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  3. Eric D. Fein, P.C. & Assoc. v. Young (In Re Young)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Texas · 2010
  4. Universal Bank, N.A. v. Kuntz (In Re Kuntz)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2000
  5. Universal Bank, N.A. v. Rich (In Re Rich)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API