Legal Opinion
Universal Bank, N.A. v. Rich (In Re Rich)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas
Decided June 23, 2000No. 19-30816PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BARBARA J. HOUSER, Bankruptcy Judge.
This Complaint for Nondischargeability of Debt (the “Complaint”) was tried on May 4, 2000. Universal Bank, N.A. (“Universal” or “Plaintiff’) seeks a determination that its debt is nondischargeable, and a recovery of costs and reasonable attorney’s fees. Debtor seeks a determination that his debt to Universal is dischargeable, a determination that Universal was not substantially justified in bringing the Complaint, and a recovery of costs and reasonable attorney’s fees. The Court has jurisdiction over this dispute pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- RecoverEdge L.P. v. PentecostCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- At & T Universal Card Services v. Alvi (In Re Alvi)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- At&T Universal Card Services v. MercerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Heilig-Meyers Co. v. Wachovia Bank, N.A. (In Re Wachovia Bank, N.A.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
- AT&T Universal Card Services v. Mercer (In re Mercer)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- At&T Universal Card Services v. MercerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001