Legal Opinion

Wood v. Wood

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 18, 1997No. 95-089PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In this nuisance action, plaintiffs Michael and Nancy Wood, Richard White, Richelle, Sandra and Todd McKenney and Andrew Campbell appeal from a jury verdict in favor of defendant Marc Wood. Plaintiffs contend the jury was improperly instructed on the elements of nuisance. In addition plaintiff Michael Wood appeals a jury award against him for $1000 actual damages and $20,000 punitive damages on defendant’s counterclaim for slander, alleging there was no evidence of actual harm. Defendant cross-appeals an order granting plaintiffs injunctive relief. We affirm the nuisance judgment, reverse the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Winey v. William E. Dailey, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  3. Crump v. P & C Food Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  4. Lent v. HuntoonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  5. State v. PelicanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Onvoy, Inc. v. Allete, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. Kneebinding, Inc., John Springer-Miller, Tina Springer-Miller and ACL Investments, LLC v. Richard HowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  3. Sweet v. RoySupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  4. Cooper v. MyerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  5. Foster v. Bittersweet Experience, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API