Legal Opinion
United States v. Hautau
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 20, 1942No. 396cPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAKE, District Judge.
The issues here arise on demurrer to an indictment against one William Hautau. The substance of the indictment reads as follows : “That on or about the 12th day of July in the year 1940, at the City of Newark, in the County of Essex and State and District of New Jersey and within the jurisdiction of this Court, one William Hautau, being then and there a person employed under the Work Projects Administration, an agency of the United States, unlawfully and feloniously did knowingly and willfully make and use and cause to be used a certain false affidavit for filing in the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Kay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. KappSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Ungar v. SeamanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- The United States of America v. Jose Diogo, Domingo Das Canas Costa and Manuel Vilanova GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- United States v. WrightDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1943
- National Maritime Union of America v. HerzogDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1948
- National Maritime Union of America v. HerzogDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1948
- The United States of America v. Jose Diogo, Domingo Das Canas Costa and Manuel Vilanova GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963