Legal Opinion

United States v. Wright

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided January 27, 1943No. Cr. 4PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEAHY, District Judge.

Defendant was prosecuted for violations of Sec. 35(A) of The Criminal Code, 18 U.S.C.A. § 80, and Rationing Order No. 3, issued on April 21, 1942, by Leon Henderson, then Administrator of the Office of Price Administration. The source of the Price Administrator’s authority to issue the rationing order is set out in the marginal note.

The first count charged defendant with wilfully making a false statement in violation of Sec. 35(A) while registering for a ration book, in that he stated that he owned no sugar when, in fact, he owned 40 pounds; and under the second count he…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alpirn v. HuffmanDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1943
  2. United States v. Tire Center, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943
  3. United States v. Beit Bros.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1943
  4. United States v. MavigliaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API