Legal Opinion
Slane v. Emoto
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided January 9, 2008No. 3:06-cv-00632PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Peter Slane and Divine Health & Natural Healing LLC bring this action against defendants Masaru Emoto, I.H.M. Co., Ltd., Hiro Emoto, and Hado Publishing USA for intentional misrepresentation and violation of Wisconsin’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Wis. Stat. § 100.18. Plaintiffs allege that defendants intentionally misled them into purchasing two “Magnetic Resonance Analyzer” machines, named the Hado-R and Hadoscan, by falsely representing that the machines were capable of changing the physical properties of water in such a way…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Kaloti Enterprises, Inc. v. Kellogg Sales Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thermal Design, Inc. v. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating & Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- In Re Countrywide Financial Corp. Mortg. MarketingDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2009
- Murillo v. Kohl's Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2016
- Thermal Design, Inc. v. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating & Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2011
- Appvion Inc Retirement Savings and Employee Stock Ownership Plan v. RichardsDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.