State v. Reich
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Birdsong, Presiding Judge.
The State has filed direct appeals under OCGA § 5-7-1 to challenge the trial court’s grant of appellees’ motions to exclude evidence that appellees refused to take blood-alcohol tests after they were advised that the refusal to take blood-alcohol tests would result in the suspension of their out-of-state driver’s licenses for six to twelve months. The trial court found the warnings given were coercive be*408cause the warnings were inaccurate in that contrary to OCGA § 40-5-51 (c), the Department of Public Safety at the time relevant to these appeals was not seeking…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. SellsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- State v. StrickmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Whittington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Pryor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. LevinerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995