Legal Opinion

State v. Reich

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 27, 1993No. A93A1662; A93A1663PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

The State has filed direct appeals under OCGA § 5-7-1 to challenge the trial court’s grant of appellees’ motions to exclude evidence that appellees refused to take blood-alcohol tests after they were advised that the refusal to take blood-alcohol tests would result in the suspension of their out-of-state driver’s licenses for six to twelve months. The trial court found the warnings given were coercive be*408cause the warnings were inaccurate in that contrary to OCGA § 40-5-51 (c), the Department of Public Safety at the time relevant to these appeals was not seeking…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. SellsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. State v. StrickmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  3. Whittington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. Pryor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. LevinerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  2. State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  3. State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  4. State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API