Legal Opinion
Sandoval v. Mitsui Sempaku K. K. Tokyo
District Court, Canal Zone
Decided May 22, 1970No. Civ. No. 2629PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COURT’S. RULING ON PENDING MOTIONS AND FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON THE QUESTION OF DAMAGES
CROWE, District Judge.
This action was originally brought in 1961 in the Supreme Court of New York in the County of New York and was dismissed on the grounds that the New York court was not a convenient forum and that the defendant accept suit in the same cause of action in the District Court for the Canal Zone. Thereafter, in July 1964, plaintiff filed a libel in personam against the defendant, Mitsui Sempaku K. K. Tokyo, in this court, alleging that the defendant was liable for damages in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mahnich v. Southern Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Crumady v. the Joachim Hendrik FisserSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- South Chicago Coal & Dock Co. v. BassettSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- International Stevedoring Co. v. HavertySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Warner v. GoltraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sandoval v. Mitsui Sempaku K. K. TokyoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Moore v. Ashland Oil & Refining Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1971
- Sandoval v. Mitsui SempakuCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972