Legal Opinion

Tilden v. Young

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1878PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Marquette. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

Plaintiff in error was sued on a labor debt, as a stockholder of the Michigan Iron Company, a corporation organized under the General Mining-law of 1853, which was adjudged a bankrupt in October, 1875. The debt sued on accrued previously.

The defendant in error recovered judgment in the court below, and error is alleged upon two grounds: first, that the remedy only lies against stockholders holding stock at the time of suit brought, and second, that the corporation was not joined as co-defendant.

Upon the first point it is not necessary to pass, as the testimony showed Mr. Tilden to have…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sigua Iron Co. v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Wineman v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API