Commonwealth v. Roose
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FLAHERTY, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal by allowance from the order of the Superior Court which reversed the conviction of appellee, Robert Roose, for DUI, related summary traffic offenses, and possession of a small amount of marijuana. The Superior Court ruled that the traffic arrest leading to the convictions was conducted by constables who had no authority to enforce the Motor Vehicle Code. The sole issue is whether constables have' authority to make traffic stops.
On January 25, 1994, shortly after midnight, two constables were waiting at a traffic light in the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. LeetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
3Cited by19 opinions
- COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. KlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- McKinley v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- McKinley v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- McKinley v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. Hlubin, M., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.