Legal Opinion

United States v. Felipe Martinez-Nava and Jose Cepeda-Cabada

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 27, 1988No. 87-1106, 87-1107PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOGAN, Circuit Judge.

Defendants Jose Cepeda-Cabada (Cepe-da) and Felipe Martinez-Nava (Martinez) appeal their convictions for transporting and harboring illegal aliens, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2) and (3), as those subsections read before amendment on November 2, 1986, and for aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2. Jointly, defendants argue that the district court (1) wrongly excluded veniremen who lived a substantial distance from the courthouse and (2) gave an improper supplemental instruction to the jury during deliberations. Individually, Cepeda argues that the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. People v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. United States v. CasamentoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Marmon Dennis RecordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. IvyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. CasamentoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API