Legal Opinion

prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,007 William L. Baxter, Ppa Andrew T. Baxter, Third-Party-Defendant v. Sturm, Ruger & Co. Inc., Third-Party-Plaintiff

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 11, 1994No. 296, Docket 93-7375PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This case returns to us after our certification of a question of Connecticut law to the Connecticut Supreme Court. Because the certification order sets forth the relevant background, Baxter v. Sturm, Ruger & Co., 13 F.3d 40 (2d Cir.1993), we summarize that background only briefly.

In August 1991, the plaintiff, William L. Baxter, asserting diversity jurisdiction, brought three Connecticut state law claims against Sturm, Ruger and Co., Inc. (Sturm, Ruger), a Delaware corporation with corporate offices in Connecticut. Baxter, an Oregon resident, first asserted a product liability claim arising…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baxter v. Sturm, Ruger & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Erickson Air-Crane Co. v. United Technologies Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. prod.liab.rep.(cch)p. 13,739 William L. Baxter, Ppa Andrew T. Baxter, Third-Party-Defendant v. Sturm, Ruger & Co. Inc., Third-Party-PlaintiffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  4. Erickson Air-Crane Co. v. United Technologies Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McCullough v. World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
  2. NORTHERN TANKERS (CYPRUS) LTD. v. BackstromDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API