Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

NORTHERN TANKERS (CYPRUS) LTD. v. Backstrom

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided July 29, 1996No. 3:95 CV 1217(GLG)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOETTEL, District Judge.

Defendants Adam Backstrom (“Baekstrom”) and Magnus Lindholm (“Lindholm”) move to dismiss the seventeenth through nineteenth claims in the Second Amended Complaint filed by plaintiff Northern Tankers (Cyprus) Ltd. (“Northern Tankers”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motion (Document # 161) is granted in part and denied in part.

BACKGROUND

Familiarity with our previous decisions and the decisions of Magistrate Judge Smith is assumed. In the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  3. Nevada v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Ginger Rogers v. Alberto Grimaldi, Mgm/ua Entertainment Co., and Pea Produzioni Europee Associate, S.R.L.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  5. Karahalios v. National Federation of Federal Employees, Local 1263Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Northern Tankers (Cyprus) Ltd. v. BackstromDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
  2. Adamu v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API