Legal Opinion
Silco Automatic Vending Co. v. Puma
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 5, 1970PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
108 N.J. Super. 427 (1970)
261 A.2d 674
SILCO AUTOMATIC VENDING COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
FRANK A. PUMA, LICENSE INSPECTOR, CENTRAL LICENSE BUREAU, CITY OF ELIZABETH AND THE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELIZABETH, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. DIERICKX MUSIC, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
v.
FRANK A. PUMA, LICENSE INSPECTOR OF THE CITY OF ELIZABETH AND THE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELIZABETH, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 24, 1969.
Decided…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Moyant v. Borough of ParamusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Salomon v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Ragan v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- Miller v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
- Mayor & Council of Hoboken v. BauerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hudson Circle Servicenter, Inc. v. KearnySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- Trombetta v. Atlantic CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Bonito v. BLOOMFIELD TP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- Miller v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & ReviewDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- News Printing Co. v. TOTOWA BOR.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.