Legal Opinion
City of Winooski v. Matte
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided April 5, 1966No. 348Published
1Opinion of the Court
218 A.2d 458 (1966)
CITY OF WINOOSKI
v.
Edward P. and Florence M. MATTE.
No. 348.
Supreme Court of Vermont. Chittenden.
February 1, 1966.
On Motion for Reargument April 5, 1966.
Harry L. Goetz, Winooski, for the city.
Joseph E. Frank, Burlington, for defendants.
Before HOLDEN, C. J., and SHANGRAW, BARNEY and KEYSER, JJ.
BARNEY, Justice.
The City of Winooski is suing these defendants as authorized under 32 V.S.A. § 5221 and 5225, to recover real estate taxes assessed. The facts are not disputed, but the plaintiff does contend that the taxpayers have forfeited the right to contest the validity of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. MahoneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1961
- Peterson v. MoultonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
- National Metal Edge Box Co. v. Town of ReadsboroSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
- Boyce v. SumnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
- City of Winooski v. MatteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.