Legal Opinion

City of Winooski v. Matte

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 5, 1966No. 348PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*464Barney, J.

The City of Winooski is suing these defendants as authorized under 32 V.S.A. §5221 and 5225, to recover real estate taxes assessed. The facts are not disputed, but the plaintiff does contend that the taxpayers have forfeited the right to contest the validity of the assessment here by failing to file any objections as 32 V.S.A. §5291 requires. The trial court ruled against the plaintiff on this question, and went on to hear the defendants claims, eventually ruling in their favor.

The right of the defendants to raise their objections to the tax has been brought here, and must be dealt…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. MahoneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1961
  2. Peterson v. MoultonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
  3. Noble v. Fleming's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1959

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stone v. ErrecartSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  2. Braune v. Town of RochesterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
  3. Town of Bristol v. United States ex rel. Small Business AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1970
  4. Dike v. McCormickSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970
  5. Swanton Village v. Town of HighgateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API