Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Waldron & Goddess
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 5, 1983PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Order and judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Blyn, J.), entered October 14,1982, denying the petition to stay arbitration, dismissing the proceeding and granting the cross motion to compel the parties to proceed to arbitration before the American Arbitration Association, affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated by Justice Blyn at Special Term. In addition, we make the following observations. The operative facts, fairly set forth in the dissent, reflect that both parties, real estate brokers employed by Cross & Brown, had agreed to submit to binding arbitration any dispute…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Riccardi & Modern Silver Linen Supply Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- In Re the Arbitration Between Acadia Co. & EdlitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Aegis Property Services Corp. v. MihalskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sablosky v. Edward S. Gordon Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Robert E. Hull v. Norcom, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Norman J. Kauffmann, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Robert E. Hull v. Norcom, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Norman J. Kauffmann, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Robert E. Hull v. Norcom, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Norman J. Kauffmann, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Sablosky v. Edward S. Gordon Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988