Legal Opinion

Cheung v. Wasatch Electric

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 2002No. 26631PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Justice.

This is a worker’s compensation ease. Wasatch Electric and CIGNA Property and Casualty, the employer and the surety (Wasatch), appeal from the Industrial Commission’s determination that injuries suffered by Wasatch’s employee, Leanne Cheung, in an automobile accident arose out of and in the course of Cheung’s employment. This Court affirms the Commission’s decision.

BACKGROUND

The following facts were found by the Commission. Leanne Cheung, an electrical engineer, became employed by Wasatch Electric in July of 1995. She worked as project manager at the Minidoka Dam…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ridgway v. Combined Insurance Companies of AmericaIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Dinius v. Loving Care and More, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Dameron v. Yellowstone Trail Garage, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Kessler Ex Rel. Kessler v. Payette CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Murray-Donahue v. National Car Rental Licensee Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Finholt v. CrestoIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Todd L. Hamilton v. Alpha Services, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Cheung v. PenaIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Kelly v. Blue Ribbon Linen Supply, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Kelly v. Blue Ribbon Linen Supply, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API