Legal Opinion

Fish v. Berzel

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1960No. 7858PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

This action is primarily for the specific performance of a contract termed an indenture entered into on March 24, 1917 between the New York Foundling Hospital, a corporation, party of the first part, and George Berzel and Mary Berzel, his wife, parties of the second part, with respect to the care, custody, adoption and rights of inheritance of Mary Speidel, an infant female child then of the age of 4 years and 3 months.

The Foundling Hospital agreed to: “place and indenture the said Mary # Speidel unto the said parties of the second part, as their own child in every respect until…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Archer v. BarnesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  2. Gipson v. First National Bank of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Klein v. KleinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Fenlon v. FenlonNebraska Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gajewski v. BratcherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Cranston v. WintersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Frederick v. FrederickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  5. In Re Berzel's EstateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API