Legal Opinion
Freeman v. Conover
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 15, 1920PublishedCited by 18 opinions
On appeal from the Essex County Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
GuMMEEJG, OTHER JusiiCB.
The material facts found by the jury in this case are as follows: In March, 1906, one Isaac Williams was the owner of eighty shares of stock of the United Water Supply Company. At that time he delivered these certificate? to the defendant, Conover, as collateral security for a debt which he owed him. A year later Williams assigned this stock to George Freeman upon condition that the latter should pay the debt to secure which the defendant held the stock as collateral. Freeman paid this debt, and au*90thorized the defendant to sell…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Anske v. Borough of Palisades ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Country Chevrolet v. N. Brunswick Planning Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Peters v. Public Service Corp. of N.J.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
- Marcum v. Richmond Auto Parts Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- Soricelli v. BOARD OF REVIEW, & C.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.