Legal Opinion

Marcum v. Richmond Auto Parts Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 1971No. 670A94PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, P.J.

The action below under the former rules of procedure was for damages based upon the alleged negligence of one of defendant company’s employees. Defendant filed its answer in two paragraphs, the first of which was in substance a denial. The second paragraph of answer sought to interpose the two-year statute of limitations applicable to personal injury cases as a bar to plaintiff’s cause of action. Plaintiff filed his reply in which he asserted that the statute of limitations could not be successfully raised by defendant for the reason that defendant’s agents fraudulently induced him into not…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Guy v. SCHULDTIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Bergeron v. MansourCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1945
  4. Howard v. West Jersey, C., R.R. Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  5. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Paramo v. EdwardsIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Kokomo Veterans, Inc. v. SchickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Collins v. DunifonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. French v. Hickman Moving & StorageIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Lawshe v. Glen Park Lbr. Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1978

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API