Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Rogers

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided June 5, 1951No. Civ. No. 9538PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THORNTON, District Judge.

An action was commenced in this Court by plaintiff, as patentee, against the co-partnership defendant, as licensee, to terminate a limited license existing between these parties. By virtue of said license the patentee, on November 7, 1949, granted to licensee a limited license to manufacture and sell 100 gross of “Zoomerangs” per month, this allotment being a part of the quantity reserved by the patentee by virtue of a previous license agreement, the plaintiff being the owner of a patent issued on January 31, 1950, bearing U. S. Patent Office No. 2,495,967 covering a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Snelling v. AdairSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. Wier v. Texas Co. Ludeau v. Texas Co. Vidrine v. Texas CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
  4. Arab Corp. v. BruceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Artvale, Inc. v. Rugby Fabrics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. Hansen v. SiebringDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API