Legal Opinion

Dutton & Kendall Co. v. Hoffman

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 23, 1928No. 11,699PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

The defendant in error (plaintiff below) obtained a judgment for $6,673.68 against the plaintiff in error (dejfendant below).

The defendant had a contract with the City and County of Denver for the construction of the Marston Lake Filter plant. The plaintiff did grading under a subcontract. The judgment was for an unpaid balance found due him, with interest thereon. The defendant pleaded a counterclaim for' money it claims to have over-paid the plaintiff by mistake. Tbe issues on tbe counterclaim were found against tbe defendant. There is no dispute as to the total number of yards of material…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cook v. FoleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  2. Gray v. CottonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Empson Packing Co. v. ClawsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  4. McGregor v. J. A. Ware Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  5. Hughes v. Model Stoker Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Edelblut Construction Co. v. FreeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API