Hentzler v. Weniger
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 97, Oct.T., 1906, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 4, Phila. Co., March T., 1905, No. 951, on verdict for plaintiff incase of Charles Hentzler v. Hans Weniger, Executor of Mary Barbara Schunzel, deceased. Assumpsit on a contract.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 97, Oct.T., 1906, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 4, Phila. Co., March T., 1905, No. 951, on verdict for plaintiff incase of Charles Hentzler v. Hans Weniger, Executor of Mary Barbara Schunzel, deceased. Assumpsit on a contract. Before Atjdenried, J. At the trial it appeared that plaintiff, a brother-in-law of the decedent, claimed to recover for board and care of the decedent from May, 1901, until May, 1902. Decedent-died on August 6, 1908. There was evidence that decedent left the plaintiff’s house in May, 1902, and resided elsewhere until she died. When Hans Weniger,…
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam,
All the defendant’s points for charge were withdrawn excepting the ninth, which was affirmed, the charge was not excepted to, the verdict was regular in form, there was *166no motion in arrest of judgment, or for judgment for the defendant non obstante veredicto, no exception was taken to the order overruling the motion for new trial, and the reasons assigned in support of that motion are not printed in the appellant’s paper-book. It is plain, therefore, that the plaintiff’s motion to quash or dismiss the third and fourth assignments of error is well founded. The case of Stephens v.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Harris v. TysonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1855
- Stephens v. GunzenhauserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
3Cited by2 opinions
- Scott Et Ux. v. LindgrenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Feingold v. KatzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910