Feingold v. Katz
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 261, Oct. T., 1909, by plaintiff, from decree of,C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., March T., 1909, No. 5,464, dismissing bill in equity in case of Max Feingold v. Louis Katz. Bill in equity to declare a sale void and for a receiver for partnership assets. Before Brégy, P. J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. The court entered a decree dismissing the bill. Errors assigned are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rice, P. J.,
The learned counsel for the appellant states the question involved as follows: "Whether equity will intervene for the relief of a partner who is the victim of fraud in the course of dissolution of the partnership, whereby the other partner has become possessed exclusively of the assets of the firm, which he acquires on the. footing of an agreed interpretation of ambiguous words in the stipulated plan of dissolution, which agreed interpretation such other partner repudiates after he has gained possession of the assets?” This may be taken as a sufficient statement of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Harris v. TysonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1855
- Germantown Dairy Co. v. McCallumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Kittanning Borough v. Garretts Run Gas Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Piper v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867
- Lieb v. PainterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GatewoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. GraumanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Lytle v. RupertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Green v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914