Legal Opinion
Ether Humphrey v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Company
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 8, 1956No. 15814_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ suit with prejudice because of their failure to comply with an earlier order 1 of the court entered June 13, 1955, requiring plaintiffs, upon the purported authority of Rule 19(b) F.R.C.P., 28 U.S.C.A., to make additional parties defendant the persons and corpo-. rations named in the order. It presents; for our review the single question, whether the order of June 13th was validly and properly entered.
The matter developed below, it comes here, upon a series of pleadings, motions and orders 2 which put and kept…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Greenleaf v. Safeway Trails, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Chidester v. City of NewarkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- McComb v. McCormackCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
- Loew's Inc. v. BaysCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lige Estes v. Shell Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Standard Oil Company of Texas and New Idria Mining & Chemical Company v. J. W. Marshall, D/B/A Marshall Pipe & Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Ward v. Louisiana Wild Life and Fisheries CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1963
- Miller v. Bargain City, U.S.A., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
- J. Baranello & Sons, Inc. v. Baharestani (In Re J. Baranello & Sons, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.