Legal Opinion

Paine v. Paine

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 8, 1983PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Justice.

Defendant Laurence Paine appeals from an order of the Superior Court (Penobscot County) granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. We find that the presiding justice erred in holding that the parol evidence rule barred the admission of evidence proffered by the defendant to establish non-delivery of a deed. We therefore sustain the appeal.

Following the death of the intestate Errol K. Paine in 1979, his law partner, the defendant James G. Lynch, found among the decedent’s personal papers an unrecorded deed which purported to convey certain real property from Laurence…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. GreeleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1892
  2. Connell v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. Burrowes Corporation v. ReadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
  4. Gatchell v. GatchellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1928
  5. Hood v. HoodSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rogers v. JacksonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  2. BROWN DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. HemondSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  3. Poling v. NorthupSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  4. Walter v. GroverSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
  5. BROWN DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. HemondSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API