American Express Co. v. South Dakota Ex Rel. Caldwell
Supreme Court of the United States
EEEOE TO THE SUPEEME COUET OP THE STATE OP SOUTH DAKOTA. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brandeis
In 1912 the Interstate Commerce Commission entered upon a comprehensive investigation of express rates, practices, accounts and revenues. Its report 1 resulted in the establishment, on February 1, 1914; throughout the United States, of the so-called uniform zone-and block system of rates in interstate transportation and the prompt adoption, in forty States, of the same system in intrastate transportation. 2 South Dakota did not adopt the national system. It adheres to a schedule of maximum express charges, known as Distance Tariff No. 2, which -was promulgated by its Board of Railroad…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
3Cited by70 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona Ex Rel. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Wisconsin RR Comm. v. C., B. & QRR CO.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Jacob Ruppert v. CaffeySupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Skinner & Eddy Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Railroad Commission v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.