Legal Opinion
Walk v. State, Dept. of Licensing
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 13, 1999No. 16914-6-IIIPublished
1Opinion of the Court
976 P.2d 185 (1999)
Larry Clinton WALK, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Washington, DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING, Respondent.
No. 16914-6-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel One.
May 13, 1999.
Reconsideration Denied June 16, 1999.
Kenneth D. Beckley, Ellensburg, for Appellant.
Timothy S. Hamill, Asst. Atty. Gen., Yakima, for Respondent.
SWEENEY, A.C.J.
WAC 448-13-040 requires several safeguards that must be "observed by the operator" before a BAC Verifier DataMaster test is performed. The operator must determine that the person does not vomit, eat, drink or smoke at least 15 minutes prior to the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Franklin County Sheriff's Office v. SellersWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. ChesterWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Eastlake Community Council v. Roanoke Associates, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
- Department of Licensing v. LaxWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Valentine v. Department of LicensingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.