Legal Opinion

Price v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 19, 1935No. Civ. 10173PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRICKE, J., pro tem.

Petitioner was employed by the Empire China Company in a branch of its operations which subjected him to the dust of burnt clay and other vitrified products coming from machines not properly safeguarded against and disseminating such dust, and was also exposed, unnecessarily, to water upon the floor, at times ankle deep, draughts of cold air and silicate dust raised by sweeping. After several years of employment and beginning early in 1927, petitioner developed a cough. This condition progressed and he developed a tiredness and weakness which, toward the end of his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marsh v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Winthrop v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Singer v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Roschak Et Ux. v. Vulcan Iron WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Alford v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Pullman Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Argonaut Mining Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Morrison v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API