Legal Opinion

Hill v. Sereneck

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 8, 1978No. Civ. 1302PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs, Edwin L. Sereneck and Cathy Sereneck, filed an action in the Montgomery County Circuit Court against defendant, Bennie Hill, alleging that defendant had breached an agreement to build a house for plaintiffs in a workmanlike manner and that due to certain defects in the house, plaintiffs had been damaged to the extent of $17,895.00. Defendant denied the allegations and counterclaimed for $890.00. His counterclaim was based on the failure of the plaintiffs to pay for certain additions and repairs made by defendant on the plaintiffs' home. Trial was held before a court and a jury and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. PruittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. F. Becker Asphaltum Roofing Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Fox v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  4. Westesen v. Olathe State BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  5. Cherry v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Lawler Mobile Homes, Inc. v. TarverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. B & M HOMES, INC. v. HoganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. DillardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. McLendon Pools, Inc. v. BushCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API