Legal Opinion

Williams v. Bank of Oxford

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 25, 1988No. 86-1432PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The issue presented on this appeal is whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of the Bank of Oxford and against Benny and Janice Williams on a guaranty agreement. The summary judgment was proper, and we affirm.

FACTS

In September 1983, the Bank of Oxford lent approximately $140,000 to Brian Williams, Rhonda Williams, and Anniston Wholesale and Retail Florist, Inc. The Bank of Oxford lent the same parties an additional $3,800 that same month. Benny Williams and Janice Williams executed a guaranty agreement for all the debts of Brian and Rhonda Williams and Anniston…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jones v. NewtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Real Coal, Inc. v. Thompson Tractor Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. Day v. Merchants Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Faith, Hope and Love, Inc. v. First Alabama BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. Horner v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Layne v. GarnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Government Street Lumber Co. v. AmSouth Bank, NASupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Tanner v. Church's Fried Chicken, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Eagerton v. Vision BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API