Tanner v. Church's Fried Chicken, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The central issue presented on this appeal is whether the law of Alabama affords a remedy for breach of an express promise in a written contract to "act in good faith," and if so, whether there is substantial evidence in the record that the defendant breached its affirmative obligation to so act.
The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Church's Fried Chicken, Inc. ("Church's"), and against the plaintiffs, Gary Tanner, Herman Gollotte, and Walter Hovell, former stockholders of Crispy Chick, Inc., who had sold out to Church's. We hold that the summary judgment was…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chavers v. National SEC. Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Harrell v. Reynolds Metals Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Wheeler v. First Ala. Bk. of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- International Resorts, Inc. v. LambertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Kennedy Elec. Co. v. Moore-Handley, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Adams v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Lake martin/ala. Power Lic. Association, Inc. v. Alabama Power Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Ex Parte CuppsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Prickett v. BAC Home LoansDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2013
- Stockton v. CKPD DEVELOPMENT CO., LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.