Legal Opinion

Xia J. Lin v. John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 22, 2004No. 03-1102PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge.

Xia J. Lin claims that the Chinese government forced her to abort two pregnancies under its coercive family planning policies and will subject her to involuntary sterilization if she is forced to return to China. Lin filed for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the United Nations Convention against Torture. The Immigration Judge (IJ) denied all relief because he concluded that Lin was not credible, a ruling the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) summarily affirmed. *749We vacate the removal order and remand Lin’s case for rehearing because the IJ’s…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. StevicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Wang He v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. C-Y-ZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1997
  5. Zebenework Haile Georgis v. John Ashcroft, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Yi Wu Zhang v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  2. Feng Chai Yang v. United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  3. Kadia v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  4. Gheorghe Vasile v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  5. Arqile Gjerazi, Klarita Gjerazi, Alba Gjerazi, and Justin Gjerazi v. Alberto Gonzales, 1Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API