Sylvester v. Jacobsen Manufacturing Co.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
GRUBB, District Judge.
This is an action under Section 146, Title 35 U.S.C.A., arising out of patent office interference proceedings. Defendant, Jacobsen Manufacturing Company, the assignee of the patent application of the inventor, Raymond K. Strasel, which application was awarded priority over the patent in suit, has moved for dismissal of the complaint.
Defendant, a Wisconsin corporation, contends that Strasel, a resident of Illinois, is an adverse party. Thus it is claimed that there are adverse parties residing in a plurality of districts, vest*94ing jurisdiction of this suit exclusively in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Washington Institute of Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- Parker Rust-Proof Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Coe v. Hobart Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Paper Container Mfg. Co. v. Dixie Cup Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Klumb v. RoachCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- E. I. duPont de Nemours & Co. v. Celanese Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp. v. SedlacsikDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1967