Legal Opinion
Carnegie Mellon University v. LSI Corporation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 18, 2020No. 3:18-cv-04571Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY, Case No. 18-cv-04571-JD 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE PARTIAL SUMMARY 9 v. JUDGMENT 10 LSI CORPORATION, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 146 Defendants. 11 12 Plaintiff Carnegie Mellon University (“CMU”) holds United States Patent No. 6,201,839 13 (’839 patent) and United States Patent No. 6,438,180 (’180 patent). As alleged in the complaint 14 for patent infringement against defendants LSI Corporation and Avago Technologies U.S. Inc. 15 (collectively, LSI), the patents “generally claim a method used in a ‘read…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estate of Osborn Ex Rel. Osborn v. KempSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
- Eagle Industries, Inc. v. DeVilbiss Health Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1997
- Bohler-Uddeholm America, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Bohler-Uddeholm Corporation, a New York Corporation v. Ellwood Group, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Ellwood Quality Steels Company, a Pennsylvania Business Trust Ellwood Specialty Steel Company, a Pennsylvania Corporation David E. Barensfeld, an Individual v. Bohler-Uddeholm Coporation, a New York Corporation Uddeholm Limited, a Canadian Corporation Ellwood Group, Inc. Ellwood Quality Steels Co. Ellwood Specialty Steel Co. David Barensfeld Bjorn E. GabrielssonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.