Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Cranmer (In Re Cranmer)
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 24, 2012No. 12-4002PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
I. Introduction
Fred Fausett Cranmer filed a Chapter 13 repayment plan, which excluded Social Security income (“SSI”) from the projected disposable income calculation. The bankruptcy trustee objected on that basis. The bankruptcy court denied confirmation of the plan, concluding, inter alia, SSI must be included in the projected disposable income calculation and Cranmer’s failure to do so meant he did not propose his plan in good faith. Cranmer appealed and the district court reversed. This court concludes SSI need not be included in the calculation of projected…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Hamilton v. LanningSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- In the Matter of Robert John Love, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- In Re Ronald Estus and Doris Estus, Debtors. United States of America v. Ronald EstusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Education Assistance Corporation v. William Wesley ZellnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Robert Ranta v. Thomas GormanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- In Re: DAVID C. WELSH and SHARON N. WELSHCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Arenas v. United States Trustee (In re Arenas)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Rajala v. GarnderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- In re FranklinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2014
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.