Feick v. Hill Bread Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On demurrer to return of alternative writ of mandamus.
1Opinion of the Court
*487The opinion of the court was delivered by
Kalisch, J.
An alternative writ of mamlamm requiring the defendant company, and its president, John J. Hill, to show cause why they should not permit the relator, with the aid of an expert accountant, to examine all the books, including books of account and books of the minutes of the proceedings of the directors and stockholders of the company, and all papers and documents in the possession of the company relating to and concerning the business and financial affairs of the company, was directed against them, permission to make such examination having…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People ex rel. Muir v. ThroopNew York Supreme Court · 1834
- Venner v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Watkins v. CassellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
- The Estate of Cory Bishop, Deceased, Ethel May Bishop, Administratrix C.T.A. v. Antilles Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Charles Hegewald Co. v. State Ex Rel. HegewaldIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
- Siena v. Grand Lodge, Etc., Order Sons of ItalyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Vernam v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.